( VS )
RetainDB vs Nia

RetainDB vs Nia: fixing memory vs fixing retrieval — two different problems

If your agent hallucinates or retrieves poorly, that's a retrieval problem — Nia's lane. If your agent forgets users between sessions or doesn't know your product's documentation, that's what RetainDB handles — user memory, context assembly, and knowledge base ingestion in one system.

88% Preference recall
79% Overall memory score
0% Hallucination rate
<40ms Retrieval latency
88%
Preference recall
LongMemEval · RetainDB
79%
Overall memory score
LongMemEval · RetainDB
0%
Hallucination rate
In benchmark testing · RetainDB
<40ms
Retrieval latency
Global average · RetainDB
TL;DR

Nia fixes bad retrieval — lower hallucinations, cheaper than RAG. RetainDB fixes forgetting users — persistent memory across sessions. They solve adjacent problems. You might need both.

At a glance

RetainDB vs Nia

Feature
RetainDB
Nia
Preference recall (LongMemEval)
88%
Different benchmark focus
Primary problem solved
Agent forgets users across sessions
Agent hallucinates or RAG is too expensive
Memory taxonomy
13 typed categories per user
Context chunks — not per-user memory
Memory scopes
6 dimensions (user, session, project…)
Document and query context — not per-user
Best for
Users who should feel known every session
Queries that need better retrieval accuracy
Knowledge base ingestion
22 connectors — Notion, Confluence, PDF, YouTube, arXiv, Playwright, GitHub, Discord, Slack and more
Document ingestion for retrieval, not per-user KB
Memory + knowledge together
User memory and KB composed in the same retrieval call
Per-query retrieval only — no cross-session user state
The specifics

Why the difference matters

01

Two different problems

Teams that conflate retrieval and memory often buy retrieval tooling — then wonder why users still have to re-explain themselves every session. Nia improves how context is selected in a single query. RetainDB makes that context persist across all queries, forever.

02

88% preference recall — the user-visible metric

LongMemEval's preference recall task is the closest benchmark to what users actually experience: does the agent remember what I told it? RetainDB scores 88%. This is the number that turns a stateless agent into one that feels like it knows you.

03

They're complementary, not competing

Many teams need both: better retrieval quality per query (Nia) and persistent memory across sessions (RetainDB). Starting with memory usually has higher immediate ROI — users feel it from session one.

04

Knowledge base is a first-class feature in RetainDB

Nia focuses on per-query context retrieval from documents. RetainDB adds a layer on top: 22 built-in connectors (Notion, Confluence, PDFs, YouTube, arXiv, Playwright, GitHub, GitLab, Discord, Slack, HuggingFace, sitemaps and more) let you ingest your entire team knowledge base. Then memory and knowledge are retrieved together — the agent knows the user and knows your product documentation in the same call.

Pick your fit

Who should use what

Choose RetainDB when
Your agent forgets users between sessions
Users have to re-explain themselves every conversation
You need your agents to know your docs, help center, or Notion workspace
You need per-user memory with 6 scope dimensions
88% preference recall is the metric you care about
Consider Nia when
Hallucination rate is your main problem, not session memory
You're replacing expensive RAG infrastructure
The use case is document Q&A, not personalisation
Common questions

What people ask before deciding

Can I use both RetainDB and Nia together?

Yes — they operate at different layers. Nia improves retrieval quality in individual queries. RetainDB makes user context persist across every query. There's no overlap.

How do I know which problem I have?

If users complain that the AI gives wrong answers, that's retrieval. If users complain they have to re-explain themselves every conversation, that's memory. Most teams with both problems should fix memory first — the impact is immediate and user-visible.

Start today — free

Your agents deserve memory
that actually works.

88% preference recall on LongMemEval. Under 40ms retrieval. Most teams are in production in under 30 minutes — no infrastructure to manage.

88% preference recall·0% hallucination rate·<40ms retrieval·No training on your data